A surprisingly
large number of West Virginians voted for a prison inmate in preference to our
incumbent President during the May Primary Presidential election.
Not so
surprisingly, some immediately howled in protest about the embarrassment to the
people and leadership of our Mountain State, even though there have been
similar situations and outcomes, both before and since, in other States.
However, the
recent Martinsburg Journal editorial had it exactly right when they cautioned
the West Virginia Legislature to resist the
temptation to "enact a knee-jerk reaction law to keep legitimate,
if lessor known candidates off the ballot.'
The Journal
correctly went on to point out "that would smack of a system intended to
protect those already in power...".
Instead, of
ham-fisted attempts to restrict the will of the voters, how about instead
increasing ballot access for all putative candidates, regardless of their
political party affiliation or other so-called "insider" bonafides?
After all, doesn't
our government belong to the people, and not the other way around?
Just asking.
No comments:
Post a Comment